![]() Hannity texted, “Can he make a statement? Ask people to leave the Capitol?” Destroying everything you have accomplished.” Ingraham texted, “Mark, the president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home. (Meadows provided the texts to the committee.) ![]() 6 recommended by a 9-0 vote that Mark Meadows, Trump’s then-White House chief of staff, be charged with criminal contempt for defying a subpoena.Īs the committee was getting set to vote Monday evening, Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the committee’s vice chairman, read text messages sent to Meadows on Jan. On Monday evening, the House committee digging into the events of Jan. In fact, what they thought at the moment was a far cry from some of the commentary that has been heard on Fox News since that fateful day, one of the worst in American history. And they took what was happening far more seriously than many of the Donald Trump supporters who have downplayed or dismissed the horrific events of that day. Well, they didn’t think it was no big deal. DeSantis is expected to officially enter the presidential race next week.What did Fox News personalities such as Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Brian Kilmeade really think while insurrectionists were storming the U.S. Trump couldn’t win in the general election. Ron DeSantis of Florida privately argued that Mr. To others, the case had the potential to reverberate politically.In a phone call with top donors, Gov. Trump in New York appeared flimsy and less consequential than many had hoped. Herndon, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.īackground reading: To some Republicans and Democrats, the charges brought against Mr. Trump’s nomination could start to seem almost inevitable. Herndon, a national political correspondent for The Times and the host of the politics podcast The Run-Up, explains what has shifted in Republican politics so that Mr. And yet it appears increasingly likely that he will win the Republican nomination for the 2024 presidential election.Īstead W. Voters in the 2022 midterms seemed to send a clear message - a rejection of Trumpism and extremism. Critics may not be appeased.Fed up parents, civil rights activists, newly awakened educators and lawmakers are crusading for “the science of reading.” Can they get results? Guest: Dana Goldstein, a national correspondent for The New York Times who writes about family policy and demographics.īackground reading: Lucy Calkins has rewritten her curriculum to include a fuller embrace of phonics. It was widely adopted in the United States, including in New York, the country’s largest public school system.īut doubts about the approach persisted, and now it seems that using balanced literacy has given a generation of American students the wrong tools.ĭana Goldstein, who covers family policy and demographics for The Times, discusses the story of balanced literacy and how Professor Calkins is trying to fix the problems that the technique created.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |